http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2007/10/18/is-isuzu-responsible/ Denver | Colorado | Travel | Culture Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:22:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2007/10/18/is-isuzu-responsible/comment-page-1/#comment-9972 Mike Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:50:54 +0000 http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2007/10/18/is-isuzu-responsible/#comment-9972 You're an idiot. They were not drunk. You’re an idiot. They were not drunk.

]]> http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2007/10/18/is-isuzu-responsible/comment-page-1/#comment-6267 richard bonilla Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:40:03 +0000 http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2007/10/18/is-isuzu-responsible/#comment-6267 you forgot to add they were drunk.... you forgot to add they were drunk….

]]> http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2007/10/18/is-isuzu-responsible/comment-page-1/#comment-5529 alisa Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:51:55 +0000 http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2007/10/18/is-isuzu-responsible/#comment-5529 While I originally agreed with the argument that there was (potentially) a design flaw in the vehicle, it occurs to me that the vehicle was never intended to be operated in a traffic lane with the rear door open. You may argue that the vehicle was not being operated but the fact remains, they were attempting to retrieve materials from the back compartment. Probably not something that any vehicle is designed to accomodate while in a traffic lane. While I originally agreed with the argument that there was (potentially) a design flaw in the vehicle, it occurs to me that the vehicle was never intended to be operated in a traffic lane with the rear door open. You may argue that the vehicle was not being operated but the fact remains, they were attempting to retrieve materials from the back compartment. Probably not something that any vehicle is designed to accomodate while in a traffic lane.

]]>