<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Future Gringo &#187; passport photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/tag/passport-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futuregringo.com</link>
	<description>Denver &#124; Colorado &#124; Travel &#124; Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:32:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Walgreens vs ePassport Photo</title>
		<link>http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2009/03/22/walgreens-vs-epassport-photo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2009/03/22/walgreens-vs-epassport-photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epassport photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walgreens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuregringo.com/?p=1468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walgreens is threatened by ePassport Photo]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.futuregringo.com/2007November/walgreenspassportsign.JPG" style="width: 238px; height: 188px" align="left" border="1" height="188" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="238" />Here&#8217;s an interesting feud&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.epassportphoto.com" target="_blank">ePassport Photo</a> allows you to upload a picture, tweak and crop it to passport specifications, then print it out at any photo center.  (Usually costing a dollar or two.)  It&#8217;s a nice site and a useful tool.  It&#8217;s also a fraction of the $7.99 price Walgreens was charging in early &#8217;08 when I took this picture offering &#8220;passort&#8221; photos.  ePassport also <a href="http://www.thetaoofmakingmoney.com/2008/01/14/561.html" target="_blank">seems cleaner and more efficient</a>.  When I had my passport photo taken at this Walgreens in 2001 they used a dirty pull down screen in front of the dairy cooler, then I had to wait 45 minutes.</p>
<p>However some drama has risen:  According to <a href="http://www.epassportphoto.com/Blog/post/2009/03/What%27s-Walgreens-afraid-of--(tiny-ePassportPhotocom!).aspx">ePassport Photo&#8217;s blog</a> <strong>customers visiting various Walgreens are having their ePassport 4&#215;6 prints refused,</strong> citing &#8220;only Walgreens can produce passport photos.&#8221;</p>
<p>The photos have nothing to do with Walgreen&#8217;s passport service, rather they&#8217;re 4&#215;6 white background photos customers send or bring in to print, which will be used for passports.</p>
<p>After receiving word of this ePassport Photo reached out to Walgreens asking how they could work together, however Walgreens emailed them back and called their site a scam.  (I&#8217;m lost on what grounds &#8211; they&#8217;ve received<a href="http://www.epassportphoto.com/Buzz.aspx" target="_blank"> very high praise</a>.)</p>
<p>Another email from Walgreens says customers will be charged a full passport price if THEIR OWN photos are printed.  Take that apart:  If you print a 4&#215;6 shot of you against a white background Walgreens will charge $7.99.  If the 4&#215;6 is of your dog they&#8217;ll charge you normal rates.    I suppose Walgreens has a right to do this, but it makes absolutely no sense and will result in nothing but bad press from annoyed customers.  Seems to me the scam is <strong>Walgreen&#8217;s charging for photos based on content rather than minding their own business and charging for quantity and size.</strong>  The content of a photo is irrelevant and should not create any decision whatsoever on Walgreen&#8217;s part.</p>
<p>People that find ePassport photo&#8217;s site are STILL going to use it, so in addition to being a bully Walgreens is screwing themselves out of money derived from regular photo printing.   They&#8217;re also losing money from people like me, who having learned of this nonsense will take my photo printing elsewhere when needed.</p>
<p>The stupidity that retail business often displays is astounding. I guess if you wanted to challenge Walgreens you could send your 4&#215;6 headshots in and say they&#8217;re for your work security badge or future mug shot.   Try it and then see what track the logic train ends up on.</p>
<p>Related:<br />
<a href="http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2008/01/28/of-interest-012808">Of Interest 012808</a><br />
<a href="http://www.epassportphoto.com/Blog/post/2009/03/What%27s-Walgreens-afraid-of--(tiny-ePassportPhotocom!).aspx" target="_blank">What&#8217;s Walgreen&#8217;s Afraid Of?</a> ePassport Photo Blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2009/03/22/walgreens-vs-epassport-photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Interest 012808</title>
		<link>http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2008/01/28/of-interest-012808/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2008/01/28/of-interest-012808/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech . Toys . Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walgreens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2008/01/28/of-interest-012808/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to make your own passport photos.  The Tao examines why anyone would pay $8 at a drug store for crappy photos, when a white cloth purchased for $2, plus $3 from epassportphoto.com nets you 32 photos.   A far greater value than my local Walgreens, who can&#8217;t even spell &#8220;passport&#8221; correctly&#8230; Original Article from The Tao of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img border="1" vspace="5" align="left" width="448" src="http://www.futuregringo.com/2007November/walgreenspassportsign.JPG" hspace="5" height="336" style="width: 188px; height: 153px" />How to make your own passport photos.  The Tao examines why anyone would pay $8 at a drug store for crappy photos, when a white cloth purchased for $2, plus $3 from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.epassportphoto.com/">epassportphoto.com </a>nets you 32 photos.  </p>
<p>A far greater value than my local Walgreens, who can&#8217;t even spell &#8220;passport&#8221; correctly&#8230;</p>
<p>Original Article from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.thetaoofmakingmoney.com/2008/01/14/561.html">The Tao of Making Money</a> via Consumerist.</p>
<p>Are hard drives going the way of zip drives and the good old 5 and 1/4?  Solid state drives, which use flash memory are more reliable, rugged, and lighter.   No moving parts =  less damage.   <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22805558/">From Suzann Choney at MSNBC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2008/01/28/of-interest-012808/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

